|
From the Desk of Richard Plumer
Miami, FL
I am not a lawyer, and cannot give legal advice. But when I found out the fraud being
perpetrated (carried out) by the Big Banks which had already wrecked the
economies of most of the nations of the world, and was still being used by the Big Banks attorneys
to attack American homeowners who had MERS-type mortgages and wreck our real estate market, I did
not have the money to hire an attorney (and could not find an attorney who would look at the new
information), so I wrote my own Motion to Dismiss (they were attacking me, too), and from April 7,
2009 when I filed My Motion to Dismiss until now (the end of July) neither that Bank nor its
attorneys has answered my filing with another single word in Court.
If you have had to take a break from paying your mortgage payments and
are worried about foreclosure - or maybe somebody is coming after you
already - you could do worse than to look at My Motion to Dismiss.
Whether you can afford an attorney to represent you, or need to
represent yourself, you - and/or your attorney - just might learn enough to
adapt to your defense to emerge victorious by considering My Motion to
Dismiss. I filed it with the Court myself (pro se), and the other side seems to have
taken a powder (fled the scene). I wrote My Motion To Dismiss with powerful information,
but since I am not a lawyer (and do not know your individual circumstances) it cannot be called
legal advice. But it is very valuable - powerful - info which I put into the form of
My "pro se" Motion to Dismiss. How you decide to use it is up to you.
(It might be better than legal advice; but that is for others to decide.
Legal advice based on the wrong information ain't what it is cracked up to be: it's just cracked.)
As the old saying says: "He who knows not, and knows not that he knows not, he is a fool, shun him."
Many attorneys, who spring forward with advice based on old (not current,
not up to date) information, are in the position of the fool who "knows not, and knows not that
he knows not". The saying's advice is to "shun him".
If you proceed on the advice of "one who "knows not", it can leave you in serious trouble.
I am like those in the song with the scoop "We found out ... that
Grandma plays the numbers" (Wynonie Harris).
YouTube did not have that one tonight, but here is one something like it (not as clear):
We Found Out: Grandpa Can Boogie, Too (Lil Greenwood & The Four
Jacks)
By listening to the financial & legal news,
I came to know the latest and most powerful information before many attorneys got the chance
to learn it. It takes time for information to get around, and I was first in line to get
the new, the latest, the real and powerful current information.
I programmed this web site. I am not an attorney. My grandfather was, and he ran
for Governor of Florida. He worked for the Florida East Coast Railway and with George
Merrick (laid out the City of Coral Gables). I got a lot of the law books for law school
thinking I would read them ahead of time (so I would not have to read them under the pressure of
going to law school), but found them so abstract and highly-esoteric I set that aside.
Then, when this case came up, and I found so much great material to base a Motion to Dismiss on,
and/but every attorney I talked to wanted to handle the case without even looking at all this new
and important material, I just had to write my own Motion to Dismiss myself.
The old ways simply would not take account of the new and critically-important information.
So I wrote My Motion to Dismiss "pro-se" (as a non-lawyer, representing myself). What
response have I received so far? The other side has not filed any more with the Court in 3 months.
I think it is because the new information exposes the sham (fakery and pretense), the same
fraud they have already been thrown out of Court for, before - and if they push that same stuff again,
I think they are risk of being held in Contempt of Court.
I don't think they will dare to go into Court with that same sham which would bring My Motion to Dismiss,
exposing them, right under the Judge's nose. Judges don't like stink.
So this is not by a lawyer - but hey, do they know everything? If they did, they would not
lose cases they lead you to have confidence in, would they? In my view, even a lawyer does
not "know" what the law "is", until whatever information the Judge is going to have and decide
upon gets in front of him - and an awful lot of the Judge's decision is going to be based on the
information you provide to the Court.
A legal friend of mine who has been a Judge gave me some pointers along the way and
says I did a very good job with My Motion to Dismiss.
I filed it on April 7, 2009, and here we are at the end of July, and/but that gang of
attorneys which should have responded to my response (if they were going to) in about 10 days
has not filed another paper with the Court since My Motion to
Dismiss. It seems as if they might have marked it *Radioactive -
Do NOT Touch !!! * and tucked it away in their safe for fear if they
tried to move further on it they could find themselves in deep trouble
in Court. You see, I found out stuff they were
doing wrong, for a client bank which had big problems of their own
making with many of their cases (of which mine was just one).
Before they tried approaching me under cover of sheepskin (while inside
they were ravening wolves), they had already been thrown out of Court
for pushing the same kind of charade. And since then, as recently
as June, 2000 of that Bank's foreclosures - which they had actually
persuaded a Court to let them hold, but that judgment was appealed -
2000 of that Bank's foreclosures were actually reversed, and the Court
told them they did not have the claim they had claimed to have.
I do not know how applicable My Motion to Dismiss might be to the
old-fashioned standard loans of days gone by - because I do not know if,
or how many, of those loans got sold into the so-called MERS (Mortgage
Electronic Registration) System market (it could be that a lot of them
were sold into it, but I just don't know) - but if you got one of those
new-fangled loans with MERS written into it anywhere within the last 10
or so years, well, My Motion to Dismiss has a lot in it for you to
consider. And you know the Clickbank policy.
You get 56 days to decide if it is something that can do you some good.
So why not get My Motion to Dismiss, for your own study, and/or to show
to an attorney, knowing that you could get 100% of your money back from
Clickbank if you decide it would not be useful to you. It's only
$49.95, a pittance compared to what it could help you and your friends
accomplish. I may add a link to the bottom of My Motion to
Dismiss to take you to My Updates page as new things arise, so save the
link you get that takes you to My Motion to Dismiss.
Note: There is an extra dimension of this developing.
I cannot lay it all out just yet, but that development, assuming you're in one of these
new-fangled mortgage mess-ups, has the potential to get you a lot of money back due to
the mess up.
So whether you get this now or not: HANG ON, and STAY TUNED.
All the best,
Richard Plumer

If you don't have a credit-card, an
electronic check option is available to US customers.
IMPORTANT NOTE:
This is a secure ClickBank transaction. This means that
nobody can see your data and you can instantly access the Total Resale Package
with complete confidence.
Are you ready to learn a lot about what the cheater, lying banks and the Fraud
Machine of Wall Street did to shoot themselves in the foot and give you
an advantage over them? Go for it. What you learn could help
you be better off by thousands.

If you don't have a credit-card, an
electronic check option is available to US customers.
IMPORTANT NOTE: This is a secure ClickBank transaction. This means that
nobody can see your data and you can instantly access the Total Resale Package
with complete confidence.
Don't let cheater, lying
banks
take advantage of you.
Order now. You'll thank yourself.
Let me be the first to
thank you for helping yourself.
Remember: if it is not helpful to you,
get your money back: no problem.
This is to help you - big-time - not hurt you.
|
|
|